The Most Influential Artists Born after 1970

why this artist is influential? are they influenced other artist or they just famous?

I can't honestly blame who is really estranged from contemporary art.

Mostly Germany based artists. Are they really the most influential? Never heard of any of them, and find them decidedly underwhelming.

An excellent presentation!
I recently visited an exhibit of Alicja Kwade's work at the Langen Foundation in Germany which was absolutely magnificent.

Tam bol šuter😂

Honorable mention goes to Jose Dávila, Mexican architect and sculptor with works in public and private galleries across the world.

=One Love=

–A

I would like to know about new mature artists over the age of 60. Young artists are still learning. Any artists under 60 is not worth mentioning.

Whinny except for Alicia ,Sala and Atia

Glorification of youth. Most of these artists are nothing more than clones of Pistiletto and Robert Smithson.

The art here looks rather too clinical, and dare I say gimmicky with exhausting labels... and do we really want to see an artist personal histories and mental issues?

What about Sarah She, she should be on the list.

Not that humanity will survive another 100 years, 50 perhaps, but not one of these artists will survive the test of time (that is shorter by the day). I guess who cares? Art is now just a parade (party, conga-line) of novelty acts by let's-alienate-the-public poseurs. Truly apocalyptic times but not ending with a bang, rather a whimper of imbecilic, trite, opaque, vacuous, dull as aphid shit attention-seeking fatuousness.

I loved the installation of the legs before the countdown and the flag with still life on top at no. 4, very compelling. There are some "art pieces" I've seen that made me question if they are artworks or just lazy productions.Sometimes beauty isn't the hindrance to creating compelling art. Sometimes the artist simply has nothing to say. It really shows.However,those two installations are very worthy artworks.Without reading any tag or hearing any explanation I can latch on to the conversation,no. 7 was good too, I'd have him higher on my list even though his work isn't my cup of tea. He did have atleast 3 pieces that were great.

A few things:

1. What this video tells me is how curators claim to be always looking for the "next big thing" and yet seem to prefer work among contemporary installation artists that often have a similar look and a common set of materials: concrete, raw wood, mirrors, cloth, rope, rebar, stone, cardboard. I mean, if I see yet ANOTHER installation with a sculpture made of cardboard boxes, bent, crushed and tied together with rope and set near a pile of bricks and wall hangings of blank square wood panels that you can buy at Home Depot, I think I'll just set the whole damn thing on fire. It's lame. It's old. It's NOT fresh.  

2. I tend to agree with Jerry Saltz' beef with works from artists like these five: often (not always) the ideas for the work seem to sit separate and apart from the work itself. The problem that I have with most of the work here (not all of it...some of it is good) is that even if there were explanations tied to the work, it STILL wouldn't be interesting to me. Explanations help to flesh out work like Agnes Martin paintings or installations by Felix Gonzalez-Torres, but not most of this stuff. In my mind, the work is too far removed from the ideas.


3. Many people who brand themselves as "conceptual" artists seem to worship at the alter of Richard Tuttle. In looking at the work of these five, much of it echoes his ideas about what art is about. I mean, I like to hear Richard Tuttle talk about his work, but most of the actual work itself isn't interesting to me: much of it just seems half-heartedly conceived, lazily executed and then dressed up with long, silver-tongued explanations about why the work is important. Again, this is old and tired.

all this conceptual art....so pretentious, and ugly

I never want to hear the fucking word "oeuvre" again in my life. I don't mind a little bullshit, but not 90% bullshit, which is being generous about this commentary. Excuse me now, while I have a whiskey and "question experience."

Honestly I'm so happy true art is starting to go through a renaissance right now, the wretched mess that was the 20th century modernism is slowly going away to give back the much more deserved space to real artists who spent years training to develop skills in drawing abd painting in the same vein as the great art from 1500 to 1900. That is the future.

“Geographica” that’s an interesting word

Wow awesome ❤️💞

Amazing, you never uttered the words climate change, you got in every other postmodern global problem as an explanation for this stuff. No more logs, rocks or instruments posing as art.

Some Attia a bit like Carl Andre

Anri Sala and Kader Attia both work in France. Kader had a gallery in Paris before and was closed last year because of Covid, he was just named as curator of Berlin Biennale; Anri Sala once studied in Paris and represented France at the Venice Biennale.

Thank you for this but I must be too old/uneducated: most of this stuff says nothing to me - maybe because I'm not there?

To me this kind of "art" is garbage. Who's behind this to convince people this is art? That's the question 😜⁉️😜😂

Wtf is this

Wow wow..... THANK YOU.

temporary CON ART

Sorry, all of this is just painfully awful

William Kentridge

Is this a joke?

Nice but not what I would call great art.

Lazy. Uninspired. A.I. voice commentary is the cherry on the cake.

Mas trozos de NADA

The Most Influential Artists Born after 1970 ? Why because you said so ?

My can they talk up a storm.

Nice...artlife always i2f the artist...one love...blessings...51

it's a no from me

Not a single American artist on the list. Might we be a little biased? You really should put a qualifier on there: European Artist and idk have links to other videos or channel that covers this. It’s not a good look.

The history is great

What a crap

Cool! Age and ethnicity don’t matter. Culture identity? There is none. The appropriate appropriation’s have been made. Transcending culture a myth? Not anymore. Imagine where this is going. Wasn’t always this way. Happiness is watching it happen. Yes Jimmy Cricket, when you wish upon a star makes no difference who you are, your dreams come true- “whops there it is”. Thanks CAI! If things keep going as implied post modernist (unknowing?) lead us to a multi-racial/cultural art experience? The intellectual meanderings of it’s theory oft criticized; blended into a sublime “combine”. The appropriate appropriations? A humanistic symbioses revealing a new art to come?

Wow, that's a lot of bullshit in one video. The only thing that actually made sense was that installation with women buried in sand. 😂

I was born with crayons and paint brushes in my hands. I began formal art studies just after earning my BA degree. I have studied and produced for over 50 years. I love learning and looking at most art, but this is not included. It's just so boring to me. And yet I stare for days at good minimal painting and drawing. I'm just not interested in decoding riddles and trying to figure out what someone might have been thinking or feeling when they took a dump and left the shit behind.